October 13th, 2008
Glenden at One Utah has a thought-provoking post on the nature of fundamentalism and how that promotes dishonesty:
"Sarah Palin is a fundamentalist and her lies make sense in that light. Fundamentalist thought reaches a conclusion and never moves beyond it; Sarah Palin is the poster child for that mindset. She reached her conclusion and stopped - she was done thinking, done examining, done wondering. Fundamentalism divides the world into good and bad - if you are a believer, you are good and what you do is guided by God and is hence good. If you are a non-believer, you are bad (right up until you convert in which case all is forgiven). "
And this video (snapped from Brandon Burt on the Salt Blog) on the anti-intellectualism of the right seemed to get something similar from another angle:
From the ACORN about page:
"Each ACORN office carries out multiple issue campaigns. ACORN members across the country work to raise the minimum wage or enact living wage policies; eliminate predatory financial practices by mortgage lenders, payday lenders, and tax preparation companies; win the development of affordable housing and community benefits agreements; improve the quality of and funding for urban public schools; rebuild New Orleans; and pass a federal and state ACORN Working Families Agenda, including paid sick leave for all full time workers."
So, is ACORN a radical group? I've seen the claim coming from the right. How does helping lower-income Americans achieve some stability qualify as radical?
"Each ACORN office carries out multiple issue campaigns. ACORN members across the country work to raise the minimum wage or enact living wage policies; eliminate predatory financial practices by mortgage lenders, payday lenders, and tax preparation companies; win the development of affordable housing and community benefits agreements; improve the quality of and funding for urban public schools; rebuild New Orleans; and pass a federal and state ACORN Working Families Agenda, including paid sick leave for all full time workers."
So, is ACORN a radical group? I've seen the claim coming from the right. How does helping lower-income Americans achieve some stability qualify as radical?